Suggested For You
- The source for this article is no longer availablePresident pays tribute to architect of modern Singapore
CBRE appoints head of valuation and advisory services for Singapore
CMT pops the champagne on higher portfolio occupancy
Making space for home-grown food
Rents for factories fall 1.4% q-o-q to $1.75 psf per month in 3Q
OCBC remains bullish on Singapore REITs despite falling DPUs
Angry investors want Reit manager kicked out
Extension of Crowne Plaza Changi Airport hotel hits halfway mark
Cost-fare revenue gap too big to bridge
The Straits Times
August 8, 2019
Mr Paul Chan Poh Hoi’s letter (Poor planning – root cause behind SMRT Trains’ losses, Aug 5) contained two inaccuracies. First, he claimed that: “Just last year, SMRT reported that it could recover 101 per cent of spending from fare box collections.” This is not correct. For the financial year ended Mar 31, 2018, SMRT Trains’ earnings before interest and taxes and profit after tax were both negative and were losses of $84 million and $86 million, respectively. Second, he claimed that SMRT Trains’ maintenance-related expenditure (MRE) in FY2018 was 62 per cent of costs. This is not correct. MRE constituted 62 per cent of rail fare revenue, and not of costs. In fact, in FY2019, MRE figure has gone up further to 71 per cent of rail fare revenue. This was necessary as we ramped up maintenance costs to deliver a higher level of rail reliability. The fact remains that due to ramped up maintenance, total operating cost has far exceeded fare revenue and is not sustainable. We will try to minimise cost but the gap between cost and fare revenue is too big to be bridged.... Continue Reading